Google: Google is the reigning king of
search engines-nothing groundbreaking there. Not only is its current market
share approximately 65 percent, but it is currently the only search engine
whose name has been recognized as an actual verb in English language. Spider
tested the search engine and its features to see what makes it number one.
However, with the updates being introduced in the engine at an impressive rate,
it is quite possible that more features are added by the time this review it’s
published.
Presentation
and Features: “Less
is more” seems to be the philosophy behind Google’s minimalistic homepage, with
its various features neatly tucked away. For those who prefer a bit of zing, a
neat button at the bottom left provides the option to change the background
image for the search engine. Unlike Bing, the advanced search button is present
on the homepage, giving user the option to specify search conditions
beforehand. Upon searching a query, results accumulated from different
categories are displayed in the main page. Apart from the regular categories
such as Web, Videos, Images etcetera, Google also includes Updates that not
only provide second by second real time updates (From Twitter) related to the
entered query, but also includes its timeline, from where you can get results
from a specific date, minute and second.
The customization/filtering features available for each
category are extremely elaborate. A few filtering features that completely
bowled us over were “Translated search” in Web (Where you can get search
results from different languages translated in English/default language), ‘closed
captioned in Videos (Retrieving results with only captions), ‘custom location’
in Updates (restricting the Twitter feeds to a specific region), ‘ custom range’
in Books (Specifying the publishing time period of the book searched) and of
course the ‘ wonder wheel’ in Web which provides a funky, illustrative way to
show related information.
Searching at the speed of thought-this is what Google’s new
predictive search feature, Google instant, is all about. Google instant basically
modifies results as you type the characters, and combined with the search
suggestions that it provides, it saves you from the hassle of tediously typing
in the entire keyword.
Search
Performance: While
Google outranked Bing for the most part, the results were not their ups and
downs. Although our basic search tests saw Google score two perfect results out
of five, Google’s database searches performed poorly comparison, with only one
exception. Acknowledging that some of our test expressions were particularly grueling,
however, the database searches functioned well within their parameters. Search
results were mostly spot on within top four items on the page if not the whole.
The veteran search engine also excelled at vague searches and semantic
searches, presenting results and exceptional accuracy and relevance, thanks to
its skilful data extraction ability. Querying variations of certain
expressions-using synonyms or natural language construction-also returned
steady results. The inclusion of Google Squared in Search engine results pages
(SERPs) allows them to offer direct answers in addition to detailed results,
and works well with semantic search presentation.
It also seemed to us that, where proximity relevance was
concerned, Google had an unfair advantage over Bing, Users from Pakistan are
automatically directed to the .pk ccTLD Google page, which priorities results
for Pakistan, where as Bing is yet to have Pakistan on its list of countries.
In any case, local search results are further elevated by clicking the “Pages
from Pakistan” option to the left of the results listed. On average, Google
also returned results 65.5 percent faster than Bing, at a speed of 40
milliseconds during the tests. There are big numbers, but it is generally a matter
of less than a second’s difference and really only notable on internet connections
slower than 512kbps.
No comments:
Post a Comment